In the "Googlepedia" article, Randall McClure supports the idea of students using Google and Wikipedia as a way of pre-researching topics to gather a general idea of said topic and eventually narrow down sources by utilizing college campus libraries and databases in order to guarantee credible sources. McClure writes an analysis on two students that research using Google and Wikipedia as their main methods of source gathering and gives recommendations to further enhance their research process. A noteworthy comparison between the two was their apathy towards verifying the credibility of said sources. This observation is important in todays world because it shows how the accessibility of information from the Internet can possibly lead to people to blindly belief in sources that appear "pleasing". McClure mentions that an easy way to evaluate a source is by using the CRAAP method: Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose. Research "funneling" is a way to incorporate todays generation of students that use Google as way of finding topics and enhances their research process by noticing credible sources from the search engine and then eventually finding actual sources through databases.
The Praxis book mentions different forms of researching: primary and secondary. Primary research is done by interacting personally with a subject. This can range from novels, films, poems, interviews and personal anecdotes. Another form of finding a source is secondary research. This type of research has already analyzed and synthesized preexisting primary sources. The two articles, "Bringing History to Life" and "What Does it Mean it Mean to Drink Like a Women?", in the book give examples of the importance of primary sources and secondary sources, respectively.
I really enjoyed your post and agree with what you have talked about. I think there is much more than just gathering pre-research type topics from sources such as Google or Wikipedia. The world today has gone digging for answers. We have made phrases such as "just google it" and "don't believe everything you read on the internet" more common in our everyday talk. Although these two statements contradict each other they are both issues that have risen with he advancement of technology. We are too trusting in our sources which can lead to being misinformed on topics that could be crucial to many different factors. One recent case in which this became an issue is with this past election. People would read one thing and assume they had the facts when in reality that is not what the candidate meant/said at all. This caused a huge uproar no matter who you were in favor of and it all started because people were spreading information without all the facts. I believe the internet is doing more harm than good when it comes to researching. Stick to the books where we know all the facts are finalized and from credible sources.
ReplyDelete